Chapter 56
Eli and His
Sons
[This
chapter is based on 1 Samuel 2:12-36.]
ELI
was priest and judge in Israel. He held the highest and most responsible
positions among the people of God. As a man divinely chosen for the sacred
duties of the priesthood, and set over the land as the highest judicial
authority, he was looked up to as an example, and he wielded a great
influence over the tribes of Israel. But although he had been appointed to
govern the people, he did not rule his own household. Eli was an indulgent
father. Loving peace and ease, he did not exercise his authority to
correct the evil habits and passions of his children. Rather than contend
with them or punish them, he would submit to their will and give them
their own way. Instead of regarding the education of his sons as one of
the most important of his responsibilities, he treated the matter as of
little consequence. The priest and judge of Israel had not been left in
darkness as to the duty of restraining and governing the children that God
had given to his care. But Eli shrank from this duty, because it involved
crossing the will of his sons, and would make it necessary to punish and
deny them. Without weighing the terrible consequences that would follow
his course, he indulged his children in whatever they desired and
neglected the work of fitting them for the service of God and the duties
of life.
God had said
of Abraham, "I know him, that he will command his children and
his household after him, and they shall keep the way of the Lord, to do
justice and judgment." Genesis 18:19. But Eli allowed his children to
control him. The father became subject to the children. The curse of
transgression was apparent in the corruption and evil that marked the
course of his sons. They had no proper appreciation of the character of
God or of the sacredness of His law. His service was to them a common
thing. From childhood they had been accustomed to the sanctuary and its
service; but instead of becoming more reverent,
Page 576
they had lost all sense of
its holiness and significance. The father had not corrected their want of
reverence for his authority, had not checked their disrespect for the
solemn services of the sanctuary; and when they reached manhood, they were
full of the deadly fruits of skepticism and rebellion.
Though wholly
unfit for the office, they were placed as priests in the sanctuary to
minister before God. The Lord had given the most specific directions in
regard to offering sacrifices; but these wicked men carried their
disregard of authority into the service of God, and did not give attention
to the law of the offerings, which were to be made in the most solemn
manner. The sacrifices, pointing forward to the death of Christ, were
designed to preserve in the hearts of the people faith in the Redeemer to
come; hence it was of the greatest importance that the Lord's directions
concerning them should be strictly heeded. The peace offerings were
especially an expression of thanksgiving to God. In these offerings the
fat alone was to be burned upon the altar; a certain specified portion was
reserved for the priests, but the greater part was returned to the offerer,
to be eaten by him and his friends in a sacrificial feast. Thus all hearts
were to be directed, in gratitude and faith, to the great Sacrifice that
was to take away the sin of the world.
The sons of
Eli, instead of realizing the solemnity of this symbolic service, only
thought how they could make it a means of self-indulgence. Not content
with the part of the peace offerings allotted them, they demanded an
additional portion; and the great number of these sacrifices presented at
the annual feasts gave the priests an opportunity to enrich themselves at
the expense of the people. They not only demanded more than their right,
but refused to wait even until the fat had been burned as an offering to
God. They persisted in claiming whatever portion pleased them, and, if
denied, threatened to take it by violence.
This
irreverence on the part of the priests soon robbed the service of its holy
and solemn significance, and the people "abhorred the offering of the
Lord." The great antitypical sacrifice to which they were to look
forward was no longer recognized. "Wherefore the sin of the young men
was very great before the Lord."
These
unfaithful priests also transgressed God's law and dishonored their sacred
office by their vile and degrading practices;
Page 577
yet they continued to
pollute by their presence the tabernacle of God. Many of the people,
filled with indignation at the corrupt course of Hophni and Phinehas,
ceased to come up to the appointed place of worship. Thus the service
which God had ordained was despised and neglected because associated with
the sins of wicked men, while those whose hearts were inclined to evil
were emboldened in sin. Ungodliness, profligacy, and even idolatry
prevailed to a fearful extent.
Eli had
greatly erred in permitting his sons to minister in holy office. By
excusing their course, on one pretext and another, he became blinded to
their sins; but at last they reached a pass where he could no longer hide
his eyes from the crimes of his sons. The people complained of their
violent deeds, and the high priest was grieved and distressed. He dared
remain silent no longer. But his sons had been brought up to think of no
one but themselves, and now they cared for no one else. They saw the grief
of their father, but their hard hearts were not touched. They heard his
mild admonitions, but they were not impressed, nor would they change their
evil course though warned of the consequences of their sins. Had Eli dealt
justly with his wicked sons, they would have been rejected from the
priestly office and punished with death. Dreading thus to bring public
disgrace and condemnation upon them, he sustained them in the most sacred
positions of trust. He still permitted them to mingle their corruption
with the holy service of God and to inflict upon the cause of truth an
injury which years could not efface. But when the judge of Israel
neglected his work, God took the matter in hand.
"There
came a man of God unto Eli, and said unto him, Thus saith the Lord, Did I
plainly appear unto the house of thy father, when they were in Egypt in
Pharaoh's house? And did I choose him out of all the tribes of Israel to
be My priest, to offer upon Mine altar, to burn incense, to wear an ephod
before Me? and did I give unto the house of thy father all the offerings
made by fire of the children of Israel? Wherefore kick ye at My sacrifice
and at Mine offering, which I have commanded in My habitation; and
honorest thy sons above Me, to make yourselves fat with the chiefest of
all the offerings of Israel My people? Wherefore the Lord God of Israel
saith, I said indeed that thy house, and the house of thy father, should
walk before Me forever: but now the Lord saith, Be it far from Me; for
them that
Page 578
honor Me I will honor, and they that despise Me shall be lightly
esteemed. . . . And I will raise Me up a faithful priest, that shall do
according to that which is in Mine heart and in My mind: and I will build
him a sure house; and he shall walk before Mine anointed forever."
God charged
Eli with honoring his sons above the Lord. Eli had permitted the offering
appointed by God as a blessing to Israel to be made a thing of abhorrence,
rather than bring his sons to shame for their impious and abominable
practices. Those who follow their own inclination, in blind affection for
their children, indulging them in the gratification of their selfish
desires, and do not bring to bear the authority of God to rebuke sin and
correct evil, make it manifest that they are honoring their wicked
children more than they honor God. They are more anxious to shield their
reputation than to glorify God; more desirous to please their children
than to please the Lord and to keep His service from every appearance of
evil.
God held Eli,
as a priest and judge of Israel, accountable for the moral and religious
standing of his people, and in a special sense for the character of his
sons. He should first have attempted to restrain evil by mild measures;
but if these did not avail, he should have subdued the wrong by the
severest means. He incurred the Lord's displeasure by not reproving sin
and executing justice upon the sinner. He could not be depended upon to
keep Israel pure. Those who have too little courage to reprove wrong, or
who through indolence or lack of interest make no earnest effort to purify
the family or the church of God, are held accountable for the evil that
may result from their neglect of duty. We are just as responsible for
evils that we might have checked in others by exercise of parental or
pastoral authority as if the acts had been our own.
Eli did not
manage his household according to God's rules for family government. He
followed his own judgment. The fond father overlooked the faults and sins
of his sons in their childhood, flattering himself that after a time they
would outgrow their evil tendencies. Many are now making a similar
mistake. They think they know a better way of training their children than
that which God has given in His word. They foster wrong tendencies in
them, urging as an excuse, "They are too young to be punished. Wait
till they become older, and can be reasoned with." Thus wrong habits
are left to strengthen until they become
Page 579
second nature. The children grow
up without restraint, with traits of character that are a lifelong curse
to them and are liable to be reproduced in others.
There is no
greater curse upon households than to allow the youth to have their own
way. When parents regard every wish of their children and indulge them in
what they know is not for their good, the children soon lose all respect
for their parents, all regard for the authority of God or man, and are led
captive at the will of Satan. The influence of an ill-regulated family is
widespread and disastrous to all society. It accumulates in a tide of evil
that affects families, communities, and governments.
Because of
Eli's position, his influence was more extended than if he had been an
ordinary man. His family life was imitated throughout Israel. The baleful
results of his negligent, ease-loving ways were seen in thousands of homes
that were molded by his example. If children are indulged in evil
practices, while the parents make a profession of religion, the truth of
God is brought into reproach. The best test of the Christianity of a home
is the type of character begotten by its influence. Actions speak louder
than the most positive profession of godliness. If professors of religion,
instead of putting forth earnest, persistent, and painstaking effort to
bring up a well-ordered household as a witness to the benefits of faith in
God, are lax in their government and indulgent to the evil desires of
their children, they are doing as did Eli, and are bringing disgrace on
the cause of Christ and ruin upon themselves and their households. But
great as are the evils of parental unfaithfulness under any circumstances,
they are tenfold greater when they exist in the families of those
appointed as teachers of the people. When these fail to control their own
households, they are, by their wrong example, misleading many. Their guilt
is as much greater than that of others as their position is more
responsible.
The promise
had been made that the house of Aaron should walk before God forever; but
this promise had been made on condition that they should devote themselves
to the work of the sanctuary with singleness of heart and honor God in all
their ways, not serving self nor following their own perverse
inclinations. Eli and his sons had been tested, and the Lord had found
them wholly unworthy of the exalted position of priests in His service.
And God declared, "Be it far from Me." He could not
Page 580
accomplish
the good that He had meant to do them, because they failed to do their
part.
The example
of those who minister in holy things should be such as to impress the
people with reverence for God and with fear to offend Him. When men,
standing "in Christ's stead" (2 Corinthians 5:20) to speak to
the people God's message of mercy and reconciliation, use their sacred
calling as a cloak for selfish or sensual gratification, they make
themselves the most effective agents of Satan. Like Hophni and Phinehas,
they cause men to "abhor the offering of the Lord." They may
pursue their evil course in secret for a time; but when at last their true
character is exposed, the faith of the people receives a shock that often
results in destroying their confidence in religion. There is left upon the
mind a distrust of all who profess to teach the word of God. The message
of the true servant of Christ is doubtfully received. The question
constantly arises, "Will not this man prove to be like the one we
thought so holy, and found so corrupt?" Thus the word of God loses
its power upon the souls of men.
In Eli's
reproof to his sons are words of solemn and fearful import--words that all
who minister in sacred things would do well to ponder: "If one man
sin against another, the judge shall judge him: but if a man sin against
the Lord, who shall entreat for him.?" Had their crimes injured only
their fellow men, the judge might have made reconciliation by appointing a
penalty and requiring restitution; and thus the offenders might have been
pardoned. Or had they not been guilty of a presumptuous sin, a sin
offering might have been presented for them. But their sins were so
interwoven with their ministration as priests of the Most High, in
offering sacrifice for sin, the work of God was so profaned and dishonored
before the people, that no expiation could be accepted for them. Their own
father, though himself high priest, dared not make intercession in their
behalf; he could not shield them from the wrath of a holy God. Of all
sinners, those are most guilty who cast contempt upon the means that
Heaven has provided for man's redemption--who "crucify to themselves
the Son of God afresh, and put Him to an open shame." Hebrews 6:6.
Preparing For Eternity
©1999-2024
All Rights Reserved
Home
Devotional
Our Beliefs
Site Search
Links
Videos
Contact Us